Module talk:Kangxi radical

On 1 July 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved from Module:Kxr to Module:Kangxi radical. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 1 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Agreed as module creator who forgot. (closed by non-admin page mover) Remsense诉 12:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Kxr → Module:Kangxi radical – To match template Template:Kangxi radical and per WP:TPN. Gonnym (talk) 07:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

All-caps

Again, there appears to be no objective reason for this to be using SCREAMING ALL-CAPS. We have a guideline against this at MOS:ALLCAPS, and specifically glosses (of any level) are given in normal sentence case surrounded by single quotes, e.g. 'dragon', per MOS:SINGLE. We've been over this in some detail already at WT:Manual of Style/China- and Chinese-related articles/Archive 8#Kangxi radical template/gloss; "I saw it this way in some book" is not sufficient grounds to conflict with two of our own style guidelines; an external author is not writing to the WP MoS but to their own idiosyncratic stylesheet (or that of some other publisher). What this style is confusingly conveying to readers is that these glosses are either acronyms or are being SHOUTED AT THE READER in an emphasis style used nowhere else on Wikipedia, and neither is appropriate. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]