Template talk:Jews and Judaism in Morocco

Antisemitism in Morocco and emigration from Morocco sections

I have restored the section with links to articles dealing with notable antisemitic incidents in Morocco as well as the section with links to articles dealing with Moroccan Jewish emigration, per WP:RS these are notable markers in the history of Moroccan Jews. דברי.הימים (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your layout gives WP:UNDUE weight to a particular POV of Judeo-Moroccan history. Please read and understand WP:V. Work that is not supported by WP:Reliable sources is considered WP:OR and not accepted on Wikipedia. It is not clear what WP:Reliable sources you are citing for this particular taxonomy. We should be looking at the work of historians such as Haim Zafrani and Emily Benichou Gottreich, Aomar Boum, etc. إيان (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the links in question:

List 1:

Antisemitism

List 2:

Migration to Israel

a) Please explain exactly which of these articles violate which policies.

b) if it is not the articles themselves but their grouping, then suggest an alternative rather than simply remove articles that are relevant to the template. דברי.הימים (talk) 07:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be opposed to including the links for antisemitism and migration to Israel under the history section—indeed, they do belong there—but it would give WP:UNDUE WEIGHT to make entire subsections for them in this general template on Jews and Judaism in Morocco. It would be a further step in the direction of undue POV to present, through the wp:wikivoice authority of the template structure, the massacre in 1033, the 1912 riots, the 1948 riots, and the 2003 bombings, all as a sequence and essentially part of the same phenomenon. These events, as well as the items under migration to Israel, some of which I wrote, are covered in the parent articles.

Per WP:V and WP:DUE, content on Wikipedia should represent what exists in quality sources. This includes the taxonomy for this template. If you wanted to make a case for this particular taxonomy, you would have to back it up by showing that similar taxonomies are used rather unanimously in grouping chapters and sections in high quality tertiary and secondary sources.

It's fine for us to learn as we go, but we need to make sure that our contributions faithfully represent what is in quality sources and that we aren't simply looking for sources that might affirm prior convictions. If you haven't yet spent much time with sources such as Zafrani, Gottreich, Boum, and others, I encourage you to do so and I look forward to collaborating with you on developing this content. إيان (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]