Template talk:Infobox flag/entry

Template:Infobox flag/entry is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Image_size

This template inserts one variant of a national flag into a Template:Infobox National flag.

The flag image is inserted into a bounding box with a 1:2 aspect ratio of image height (= flag width) to image width (= flag length). This is not because 1:2 is the most common flag ratio (2:3 or 3:5 is more common), but to allow multiple variants of a flag that differ in aspect ratio to be listed together in the same infobox such that each variant is displayed with the same image height.

This is important in order to override the more common Wikipedia convention of specifying image widths without regard to image heights. Unfortunately, if this is done in the case of flags this amounts to fixing flag lengths to a common standard, whereas flag widths should be standardized instead. In vexillogical usage, a flag's length is seen as a function of it's width, and not vice versa; i.e., more rectangular a flag is, the more length it should be allowed to have, when displayed next to other flags. --ScottMainwaring 16:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK I think I understand, but I'll make it possible to insert custom sizes (for infoboxes with only one 2:3 flag). -

\mathrm {S}

.

\mathrm {Solberg}

\mathrm {J}

. 17:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Bug?

If |Use is empty, then |Symbol is omitted. See {{Infobox flag#Example}}. Can this be fixed without introducing a new ! Symbol? Cheers, Pædia 21:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please correct a link inside from Glossary of vexillology to Vexillological symbol. The pictures like the one in Template:Infobox flag#Example are explained there. Wikisaurus (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done S.A. Julio (talk) 02:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 6 November 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Little capitalization fix: edit text for code 001111 as per template sandbox. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 03:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 10:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]