Talk:Isotopes of barium
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of barium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Barium 112?
[edit]The article on isotopes of xenon briefly mentions barium-112 as the "heaviest nuclide with equal numbers of protons and neutrons". It isn't in the Ba article; maybe it was discovered recently, or maybe it isn't confirmed and the article on isotopes of Xe needs fixing. Can someone fix this? It's beyond my level of expertise. Oaklandguy (talk) 05:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- I found a reference on it, but it requires subscription to access: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-70609-0_115. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Possible alpha decay of 140Ba
[edit]The following table is made according to the trend shown in [1] as well as the Geiger-Nuttall law.
| n | 5n2nX | Alpha decay energy (MeV) | Possible order of theoretical alpha decay half-life |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 135Xe | Alpha stable | |
| 28 | 140Ba | 0.74 | 1042 yr |
| 29 | 145Ce | 0.20 | 10118 yr |
| 30 | 150Nd | Alpha stable | |
| 31 | 155Sm | Alpha stable | |
| 32 | 160Gd | Alpha stable | |
| 33 | 165Dy | Alpha stable | |
| 34 | 170Er | 0.05 | 10408 yr |
| 35 | 175Yb | 0.60 | 1084 yr |
| 36 | 180Hf | 1.29 | 1045 yr |
| 37 | 185W | 1.59 | 1046 yr |
| 38 | 190Os | 1.38 | 1047 yr |
| 39 | 195Pt | 1.19 | 1064 yr |
| 40 | 200Hg | 0.72 | 1095 yr |
| 41 | 205Pb | 1.47 | 1051 yr |
2A04:CEC0:1011:B1F1:C5E3:F416:5CD7:1B03 (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
When NUBASE2020 lists only an upper limit for the intensity of a decay mode, has the process been observed?
[edit]NUBASE2020 says 12C<0.0034 for 114Ba.
In the explanation there is a sentence "α=? means that the α-decay is observed, but its intensity is not experimentally known". It does not explain for "(decay mode)<(upper limit)". 129.104.241.214 (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
why isn't 140Ba listed as a main isotope?
[edit]It has the longest half-life among the unstable isotopes of barium as fission products! 14.52.231.91 (talk) 07:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)