Template talk:IPv6 transition mechanisms

ISATAP

AFAICT this is no longer an RFC (and may never have been "standards track"). The preceding document and those earlier were being pushed to be put on standards track at least in ancient mailing list messages, but apparently weren't, and I can't find any newer version.

I'm going to update the infobox template and move ISATAP to the informational section, but there are others more up to date on this kind of thing so if you have something newer go ahead and change it back (and please post a ref here, I'd like to read it :D). The ISATAP article lacked anything newer but made things seem like they were a standard. I see it used enough that it might as well be one, but that's not quite the same as "this is part of the internet". I'm not adding a ref to the infobox to avoid spamming up pages using it with more references but if that's kosher someone feel free. --A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Meant not being considered for standards track RFC in first paragraph there, sorry. RFCs on things that are just informational "here's how you do this thing that isn't a standard" seem kinda weird to me. --A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)