Template talk:Extra-parliamentary

RfC on the colour of Template:Extra-parliamentary

should the colour of Template:Extra-parliamentary be the current lighter #FFA4A4 or the original darker #99? Gooduserdude (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

#FFA4A4
#F99

Gooduserdude (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Survey

• #F99, clearer, looks better for the purpose in election result tables and is not meant to be used with blue links so it complies with accessibility guidelines Gooduserdude (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• #F99 I prefer this darker shade P1221 (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

A very very tiny difference when viewed on a different PC. The lighter one is slightly better. North8000 (talk) 21:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

You are right indeed. Yesterday I voted by mobile and I could sense a difference in the tones. Today I'm looking again from a PC and I see no big differences between the two colors... P1221 (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

• (invited by the bot) ?? They look the same. North8000 (talk) 18:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• WP:CONLEVEL A tiny RFC on this specific template is unlikely to undo any existing consensus by the larger community on templates as a whole.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

  #F99 as per reasons above, although I also think that this RfC is slightly trivial and unnecessary (unless there was unresolved discussion in the talk page that I'm missing) ¡Ayvind! (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Other than the talking thru edit histories, and talking on the other users page with one response, there's also here. -Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

• Comment i tried to restore #F99 on this template but was reverted by a user repeatedly, he was reffering to accessibility guidelines, while i pointed out, this template is never used with blue links, and if it ever did then he should have reverted that edit (and that user would be doing wrong not me) not #F99 on this template Gooduserdude (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)