Template talk:B

This template was considered for deletion on 2018 July 8. The result of the discussion was "withdrawn".

Formatting

How about inserting the comments as suggested by the banner meta itself, i.e. as follows:

| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no>
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy    --> = <yes/no>
| b3 <!--Structure              --> = <yes/no>
| b4 <!--Grammar & style        --> = <yes/no>
| b5 <!--Supporting materials   --> = <yes/no>
| b6 <!--Accessibility          --> = <yes/no>

Comments could also be optional, activated by a template parameter. GregorB (talk) 10:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Good idea. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 00:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GregorB (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Template was always substituted and is no longer needed. So replaced with a bolding template. — BrandonALF ^(talk) ^{(Please ping me)} 01:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To repeat what I said at User talk:BrandonALF: {{B}} has nothing to do with boldfacing. I've restored the proper template code and documentation. Wikipedia does not have templates as wrappers for basic HTML elements that are re-implemented in '''wikimarkup'''; attempts to create them have repeatedly been deleted at WP:TFD; even {{span}} and {{div}} were deleted. We only have template wrappers for non-wikimarkup elements, and mostly only those used in semantic markup: {{em}}, {{strong}}, {{code}}, {{var}}, {{kbd}}, {{samp}}. PS: The fact that {{B}} is intended to be substituted is irrelevant. Many templates are, and will even throw an error if you don't do it. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]