Template:Did you know nominations/United States v. Graham

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

United States v. Graham

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in Maryland, as per the recent case United States v. Graham, the government can order providers to disclose historical cell phone location data without a warrant or probable cause?

Created/expanded by Pengstr (talk). Nominated by Applecupcake (talk) at 08:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

• This article is a good account of the case concerned. It fulfils the DYK criteria in general, however, though the hook statement is covered by the references and is the main point of the article, it does not specifically appear in a single sentence with an in-line citation. I think this is unimportant in this case. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)