The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Overall: Hook is interesting, although the inline citation from the article is better at supporting the hook than the citation given here. Maybe use "historically" instead of "traditionally", but that is at the nominator's discretion. Earwig report[1] is clean. Joofjoof (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
@Joofjoof: Thanks for the review. As suggested, I've modified the hook and included the article's Reinsurance News source, too. Also, QPQ has now been done, JGHowes talk 15:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you JGHowes. I have updated my review. Just a note: it may be a good idea to wikilink bond trading. Joofjoof (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Hook is interesting, although the inline citation from the article is better at supporting the hook than the citation given here. Maybe use "historically" instead of "traditionally", but that is at the nominator's discretion. Earwig report[1] is clean. Joofjoof (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you JGHowes. I have updated my review. Just a note: it may be a good idea to wikilink bond trading. Joofjoof (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)