The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
... that although the Liberty Theatre was built in 1904 to host Rogers Brothers musicals, the brothers did not appear at the theater after 1907? Source: Henderson, Mary C.; Greene, Alexis (2008). The story of 42nd Street : the theaters, shows, characters, and scandals of the world's most notorious street. New York: Back Stage Books. p. 118.
ALT1: ... that although the Liberty Theatre was built in 1904 to host Rogers Brothers musicals, the brothers made their last appearance there three years later? Source: Henderson, Mary C.; Greene, Alexis (2008). The story of 42nd Street : the theaters, shows, characters, and scandals of the world's most notorious street. New York: Back Stage Books. p. 118.
Comment: QPQ pending, more hooks later. Any hook suggestions would be appreciated.
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Liberty Theatre, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
QPQ: - QPQ needed Overall: @Epicgenius: Article was assessed as a GA on 19 January, easily long enough and free of copyvios/close paraphrasing. Looks good to me, just needs QPQ. All hooks are reasonably interesting (some use offline sources); I prefer ALT 3 as a hook personally. (Please tell me if I've done anything wrong, this is my first DYK review!) Schminnte (talk • contribs) 19:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
@Schminnte: Thanks for the review, and sorry for the late response - I completely forgot about this nomination. I have done a QPQ now. By the way, welcome to the DYK reviewing process; your review looks all good. Epicgenius (talk) 14:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- QPQ needed
@Epicgenius: Article was assessed as a GA on 19 January, easily long enough and free of copyvios/close paraphrasing. Looks good to me, just needs QPQ. All hooks are reasonably interesting (some use offline sources); I prefer ALT 3 as a hook personally. (Please tell me if I've done anything wrong, this is my first DYK review!) Schminnte (talk • contribs) 19:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
