Talk:Chinese paper folding

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Origins of paper folding

I have removed the bit in the lead saying paperfolding originated in China and that it was brought from China to Japan in the 6th century. This is cited to "Engel, Peter (1994). Origami from angelfish to Zen. New York: Dover Publications. p. 23. ISBN 9780486281384.". The tiny 'history' in from Angelfish simply has no basis in anything except conjecture. See History of origami. We don't know when paperfolding started, all we know is when paper was introduced from China to Japan. We don't know if any paperfolding was done in China before then or when it started in China. Even the word 'origami' may be a Japanese translation of a German term and not as described in that book, they used a different term in the 19th century.

By the way there should be some mention of burning paper yuanbao in the article I think, the practice of burning paper models at funerals must date back quite a bit. Dmcq (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put a ref, verifiability is what matters. Although I have no intention put it back, that's quite something... Fine, fine, how about: "Some scholars say that it was the predecessor of Japanese origami,(ref here) but this is doubted by other scholars.(ref here)" Anyway, I guess I'll leave it at this reply and drop it now. Cheers, Cold Season (talk) 23:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What you did was quite correct and thanks, it's just sometimes references conflict with each other. And you've started the ball rolling as it were so now other references need to go in otherwise yours would stand. I'll get some others and stick it all into the history section. Dmcq (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chinese paper folding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111021043007/http://www.origami-cdo.it/articoli/storigen.htm to http://www.origami-cdo.it/articoli/storigen.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]