Jump to content

Talk:Yellow-tailed black cockatoo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ucucha 18:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some quick things:

  • Perhaps mention distribution of ssp in lead?
(okay, shuffled a bit - I am not a fan of parentheses but they seem to make it less confusing than more commas in the lead) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you really need a separate subheading for xanthochroism?
(no, it is pretty stubby isn't it?) Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should conservation status go under "Relationships with humans"?

Ucucha 18:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(yeah, I think it is better moved actually) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "south and central eastern Queensland" - from the map, just saying southeastern Qld would look good enough.
Okay, some local knowledge is helpful here. The term SE Queensland is usually restricted for the SE corner (which is where the capital Brisbane is) - once you get much north of Brisbane, it becomes more "central" (even though still in the "southeast" of the state. Hence it reaches a bit of queensland better described as "central" - here is a government summary that uses the same word. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: And there is a definition here. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the explanation; the current wording makes sense to me now. Ucucha 23:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure whether the bold for the ssp is justified
(My view is that it helps navigation quite a bit - and have used it in Red-tailed Black Cockatoo and Common Raven, but not (I now realise) in Willie Wagtail. I guess looking here at MOS:BOLD#Boldface, it is a little like a (short) definition list. Italics are problematic as there is conflict with scientific names. Might be something worth raising on bird or mammal wikiproject anyway. If you feel really strongly I can remove it but I do think bolding makes it a little clearer) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, let's keep it. Ucucha 23:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Add to list of words people outside the US spell in a weird way: moult)
  • cossid moth - refers to a family I guess? Then best link here.
(the first mention of the four is linked. Do you think the article is big enought to warrant one of the ones at the bottom linked as well?) 23:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Actually fixed that myself after writing this, sorry. Ucucha 23:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do you have an accent mark only on χρόος and not on other Greek words?
(ack. Got the accent on the wrong vowel - it is the poetic form of the word where the two omicrons have been elided into an omega. I'll revisit my lexicon later and get back to you on that one.) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: damn, stuff is everywhere and the lexicon has gone walkabout. Nevermind, I'll lose the accent. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(gosh. didn't notice that one. I have never seen anything referenced on them specifically being talkers, though I suspect they'd have some ability but less than Little Corellas, african Greys etc. Will hunt that one and remove cat if unable to verify) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • There seem to be a few things mentioned in the lead that are not in the body

Ucucha 18:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

added bit about Sydney in body of text. I didn't add the bit on Melboune, though I know they are there. Will look for a reliable source on that one. frustrating Have ahd some luck on Melbourne, but a local bird book would be better. I think I have rejigged so everything else in the lead is now in the body as well Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good. You seem to have a contradiction where the lead says that the Eyre Peninsula population is critically endangered and the body that the SA population is vulnerable. Ucucha 15:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay - the bird occurs in different regions of southeastern South Australia. Overall, it is classified as "vulnerable" as there has been some decline noted. A further reason for the classification is the critical status of an isolated population further west on the Eyre Peninsula. This population, however, has no taxonomic status as such, it's just isolated. I'll see if I can clarify it I rewrote the bit so it should be clearer. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
got it - not much on it though. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Thanks/much appreciated in advance. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here goes (Zoological Record):

  • Title: Mimetic song in superb lyrebirds: species mimicked and mimetic accuracy in different populations and age classes. Author(s): Zann, Richard; Dunstan, Emily Source: Animal Behaviour Volume: 76 Issue: 3 Page(s): 1043-1054 Published: September 2008
    • Lyrebirds mimic C. funereus.
(haha, cool and added. I once had a lyrebird mimic a mobile phone in the bush near me. freaky) Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
:-) Ucucha 13:19, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: Angiostrongylus cantonensis as a cause of cerebrospinal disease in a yellow-tailed black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus funereus) and two tawny frogmouths (Podargus strigoides). Author(s): Monks, Deborah J.; Carlisle, Melissa S.; Carrigan, Mark; et al. Source: Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery Volume: 19 Issue: 4 Page(s): 289-293 Published: December 2005
(fascinating and added - it's a rat nematode so in your area of interest too...) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I went off to write the article, only to discover that it's there already—that's what it gets for infecting humans. What are the parasites doing under "Behaviour"?
I changed heading to Ecology and behaviour - I guess because alot of the section is about both. I thought Parasites would look odd as a lvl 2 heading by itself. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good! Ucucha 13:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: Haematological characteristics of response to inflammation or traumatic injury in two species of black cockatoos: Calyptorhynchus magnificus and C. funereus. Author(s): Jaensch, S.; Clark, P. Source: Comparative Clinical Pathology Volume: 13 Issue: 1 Page(s): 9-13 Published: August 2004
(not earth-shattering - it says inflammation or traumatic injury led to haematological changes of mild to moderate anaemia, heterophilia and monocytosis.) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably worth adding for FAC though. Ucucha 13:19, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just went to look at it again, and noted it is also a Western Australian article - and as they called the species the White-tailed, I suspect this is also from the time the two (three actually) were considered conspecific. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Ucucha 13:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: Observations on a nesting hollow of yellow-tailed black cockatoo, and the felled tree that hosted it, in north-eastern Tasmania. Author(s): Wapstra, Mark; Doran, Niall Source: Tasmanian Naturalist Volume: 126 Page(s): 59-63 Published: 2004
(good little article. added) Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: A review of feather mites of the Psittophagus generic group (Astigmata, Pterolichidae) with descriptions of new taxa from parrots (Aves, Psittaciformes) of the Old World. Author(s): Mironov, Sergey V.; Dabert, Jacek; Ehrnsberger, Rainer Source: Acta Parasitologica Volume: 48 Issue: 4 Page(s): 280-293 Published: December 2003
(interesting. added) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: Foraging behaviour of the yellow-tailed black cockatoo for larvae of the giant wood moth in hardwood plantations in south-east Queensland. Author(s): Dickinson, Geoffrey R.; Huth, John R.; Lawson, Simon A. Source: Sunbird Volume: 33 Issue: 3 Page(s): 99-107 Published: December 2003
(this has been discussed in material I've read - we've got info on them hunting moth larvae. I might expand a bit for FAC) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: Eyre Peninsula yellow-tailed black-cockatoo. Author(s): van Weenen, Jason; Ancell, Di; Cooper, Jane Source: Wingspan Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Page(s): 32-33 Published: June 2001
(the same author has placed updated info on the webpages) Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Title: Carnaby's Cockatoos feeding on liquidamber. Author(s): Kenneally, Kevin F. Source: Western Australian Naturalist Volume: 23 Issue: 3 Page(s): 224-225 Published: January 31 2002
(used to be conspecific, now separated out) Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for missing that; the WA journal should have been a red flag. Ucucha 13:19, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And it goes on (81 records). There's obviously a lot that has been published on this species; some may be interesting (like the disease and parasites stuff), some probably doesn't add much to what is already in the article. Ucucha 20:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • "but birds seized by governments": presumably these are smuggled birds. The abstract of the source says "national government officials": is this in Australia only or it this world wide confiscation? Clarity issues should be easy to fix. Snowman (talk) 10:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am presuming it means governments in Europe as the birds are already in Europe (i.e. birds not intercepted until they got to Europe), and hence might have been better placed in local zoos rather than face a long journey and then stay in quarantine back home to Australia. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: changed to "birds seized by European government agencies" Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subspecies: You call the possible third one both whitei and whiteae. Also, I'm not sure why you're saying that the Tasmanian population would be the third subspecies, since it is the mainland birds that would go to another subspecies name. Isn't it less cumbersome to say that those from the mainland represent a possible third subspecies? Ucucha 13:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. I wonder why it was worded like that. I think because most of the study has been of birds in Victoria and South Australia, hence even though the type was tasmanian in origin, much of what we know about what we call xanthonotus is from mainland (not tassie) specimens. Tricky - not sure what to do about it as that is how it is impressed in the source(s) Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: On that basis, I'd err on the side of caution with sources, so I changed the lead to reflect sitting on the fence really. Funnily enough, the author Mathews also had a problem with gender of whiteae/whitei...but I have streamlined it for the text. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the change in the lead is an improvement (and was in fact planning to do the same change), and similarly changed the text. We don't need to say that either mainland or Tas birds would be the third subspecies, so it's better to just avoid the issue. Thanks for the spelling clarification. Ucucha 14:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, are you able to get the fulltext of the Zoo article I found? ref 48 - Management and husbandry of black cockatoos Calyptorhynchus spp in captivity? Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On its way. Ucucha 21:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have added some zoo material. I think I have addressed all I can at the moment (as I can't find the damn lexicon now...packing boxes everywhere..) Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The talking birds category? I'll read again tomorrow to see whether I have anything else to pick on, and then likely pass. Ucucha 04:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the cat - cockatoos in general are indifferent talkers (Corellas being exceptions) - if we include this bird we should include a great many psittacines. I have not seen any referenced material about YTBCs having any talking ability, though I suspect they could learn a few words. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few more things:

  • Measuring around 33 cm (13 in), tail length averages 5 cm (2 in) longer than in xanthonotus. - This is from the description of xanthanotus...
(oops - that was left over from before disentangling the subspecies. removed now) Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yellow-tailed Black Cockatoos can cause damage in pine and eucalyptus plantations by weakening stems through gouging out pieces of wood in order to extract moth larvae. These gum plantations result in a corresponding increase in the larva of the cossid moth Xyleutes boisduvali, which resulted in increased predation by cockatoos. Furthermore, the plantations lacked undergrowth which would have prevented cockatoos from damaging younger trees. - the first part of the second sentence doesn't make sense, and are you speaking about a particular plantation or about a general rule here?
(clarified as general rule - could take 'generally' out I suppose...). Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am still at a loss what "gum plantations result in a corresponding increase in the larva" means. Ucucha 22:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Eucalyptus monoculture --> increased population of moths --> alot more cockies are gouging great chunks out of young trees to get at them. Not sure how to make it clearer but can think about it Casliber (talk ·

contribs) 14:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Tried "These gum plantations result in a corresponding increase in population of the larva of the cossid moth Xyleutes boisduvali, which then leads to increased predation (and hence tree damage) by cockatoos." Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I read somewhere that this is the largest cockatoo and largest known Australian psittaciform. If true, it would be nice to include it.
(I know! this has baffled me too - I have seen it mentioned here and there as the largest, but everywhere seems a bit shy in coming out and stating it for some reason. I will hunt around..) Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Addendum - the Palm Cockatoo is heavier and chunkier and more or less the same length, so this is why the ambivalence about the size I think. I should have remembered this. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ucucha 20:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am passing the article now. Thanks for all the fixes. It should do well at GAN, although my literature search hasn't been totally exhaustive yet, so I might have to do another check. Ucucha 15:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yellow-tailed_black_cockatoo/GA1&oldid=608950844"