Talk:Yamashita Yoshitsugu

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yamashita Yoshitsugu article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yamashita Yoshitsugu has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 10, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
January 30, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 23, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Yoshiaki Yamashita, a pioneer of judo in the United States, was the first person to have been awarded 10-dan* grading in Kodokan judo?*
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 26, 2022, and October 26, 2024.
Current status: Good article

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Japan: Biography / History / Sport Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:33, November 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Biography task force.

This article is supported by the History task force.

This article is supported by the Sport task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Fixing Title

How do I fix the title, which should read Yoshiaki Yamashita? Joseph Svinth 07:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If Yamashita is his family name, then the article title should be "Yamashita Yoshiaki", per WP:MOS-JP (because he was born prior to the first year of Meiji, 1868). Bradford44 14:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When it was uploaded, the title was solely "Yamashita"... Joseph Svinth 23:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination

Comment The page should be moved to "Yamashita Yoshiaki", per WP:MOS-JP#Names. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bradford44 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

GA Review

Wow! Quite an interesting article! Very good prose, I particularly like the japanese characters provided with translations. I think this article meets the good article criteria. While the article is very well referenced (and with primarily non-internet citations, too), editors should probably review WP:CITE for tips on formatting the references a bit better. There are a few websites in the citations, and these should be formatted a bit differently (see the example I provided for the last one (which I also added a cite to the 10th dan posthumous bit). Other than that, I think more info could probably be added to the 'later life' section; the two quotes seem to dominate that section quite a bit, so perhaps some non-quote prose could help that out more. But these are minor glitches, which should definitely be fixed prior to WP:FAC, but IMHO, not worth holding up GA status. Good work! Dr. Cash 18:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.^[?]
Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.^[?]
As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use ^th; for example, instead of using January 30^th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.^[?]
This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.^[?]
The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Nate1481(^t/_c) 11:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Yamashita Yoshiaki/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article is very good, currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is pretty good, 7/10.

The lead is too short and doesn't properly introduce the article. Please expand it into at least one full sentence.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

References should come after punctuation, not in the middle of sentences.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: