Talk:Xiphactinus

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Order change

The Paleobiology Database ([1]) lists Xiphactinus under the order Pachycormiformes. Because that database is edited by university professors I think it's right to change the order.Jerkov 20:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the most recent discovery of the species which is referenced here: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/80-million-year-old-fish-story-98658064.html I am uncertain how to add the reference to the body of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.204.46 (talk) 03:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xiphactinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110723131237/http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=611&rank=class to http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=611&rank=class

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oceans of Kansas site self-published source?

The self-published source tag was placed sometime ago (2011?) without explanation.

The author of the website and Oceans of Kansas (book), Mike Everhart, is the Adjunct Curator of Paleontology at the Sternberg Museum of Natural History and past President of the Kansas Academy of Science. It is not much of a stretch to consider him expert on the fauna of the Smoky Hill Chalk, so I added that status to the tag.

Is the criticism the fact that the curator published the cited website?

Is the criticism the (presumptive) fact that the curator placed the citation of his own work in the page? That is, did the tag's OP have any knowledge whether User:Tylo[saurus]mike was Mike Everhart? He might be, given his field. I could ask Mike Everhart.

Would the tag be resolved by a visit to the library to get the page number from the book for the citations (citing the book rather than the website)?

IveGoneAway (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]