Talk:Active Directory Rights Management Services

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Article name

Should this be moved to Active Directory Rights Management Services or AD Rights Management Services or antyhing else since the name has changed? I, personally would suggest that it be moved to Rights Management Services since that is the most common name it is known by and that would be a neutral ground between WRMS and ADRMS. If no one opposes within two days (July 12), I will perform the move. Of course, I am open to discussion after that as well.--soum ^talk 14:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I am doing it now. It can be undone anytime if needed. --soum ^talk 06:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... "Rights Management Services" should be fine for a general name, yeah. -/- Warren 04:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a long time since this discussion commenced (I wasn't even registered then!), but I've BOLD'ly moved the article to prefix the title with Active Directory, as I feel that "Rights Management Services" is too generic of a title, and is too likely to have been used in other ways.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft marketing

Ok, it's painfully obvious that this article was written by the M$ marketing guys. The way it is written... directed to buyers, marketing speak, no technical information whatsoever, markup ONLY on M$ products, no comparisons with other technologies, always pointing out that companies can use this to do this and that, no examples, ... The OP should read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.108.52.23 (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Office 2010

Presumably Office 2010 is covered by this rights management as well? Should it be added to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlitvak (talk • contribs) 01:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gigatrust?

"RMS" isn't really a format in itself - it's a wrapper around some other format (eg: Excel) isn't it?

I don't think Gigatrust "protection" qualifies for a PDF? Converting a PDF into something else that does RMS, is not per-say RMS protection for a PDF ... 120.151.160.158 (talk) 17:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatives ?

I don't see any relevance in this paragraph. Sounds like the text of an competitive product but no direct link (which is good) is given. The kind of alternative is nice to have, but there are dozens of other 'alternatives' to the kind of rights management Microsoft is doing here. I would therefore delete this paragraph - any comments? EUCosma (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nuke it - I just jumped to the Talk page for the same reason - halfway through the article it veers off to talk about a specific product and the language is very much what I'd expect in a press release or elevator pitch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.37.166.142 (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Codename Lisa (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Active Directory Rights Management Services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]