Talk:Williams gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Better alternative?

OK, so what was the better Union alternative? What was the weakness of this design? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 12:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duh

If this is an accurate replica, this was just a fast-firing breech loaded gun. Surely it was revolutionary for its time by that feature alone, but not substantially different from the de:6-Pfünder-Feldkanone C/61 for example. It inclusion in Chinn's 1951 machine gun book is pretty questionable, especially the name he gave it—"Williams Machine Gun". 86.121.18.17 (talk) 18:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]