Talk:Willie Ross, Baron Ross of Marnock

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I suggest that the following wording should be removed:

His conduct and integrity,as well as that of several other Labour and Conservative politicians, in the Paddy Meehan miscarriage of justice is widely open to question.

For the following reasons:

1. Mr Ross is deceased and therefore unable to defend his reputation

2. The comment has no source or balancing viewpoint

3. The comment involves a legal case and 27 words is not sufficient to explain all the details of that case

I'll leave this up for a week and see what people think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gecko177 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]