Talk:William Barton (soldier)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Rank

The original article said that Barton was a General in the Continental Army. Actually he was a brevet colonel. He was possibly a General of the local militia in Rhode Island. The word used in his online bios is "locally."Student7 14:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Myers, could you footnote the rank(s) with Boatner? This will save a lot of work later. A lot of people thought he was a "general" and have often referred to him that way. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done one better and provided a link in the references right to the page in Heitman's Historical Register that Boatner cited, thanks to the magic of Google Book Search. Now everyone can easily read the dates of Barton's promotions. None of the scholarly (or semi-scholarly, in the case of American Heritage Magazine) sources listed here refer to Barton as a general. The other two web sources, which don't really qualify as reliable sources, say he was later a general, which is perhaps a confused reference to his eventual role as adjutant general. —Kevin Myers 16:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]