Jump to content

Talk:Why Don't We Do It in the Road?

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
I don't think this song inspired Revolution 9 as Revolution 9 was one of the first songs recorded for the album, and this song was not recorded until much later in the sessions. Not sure, but pretty sure. :-) - 5percent4nothing, 7/1/06
I think this is by far the Beatles' best song. --129.186.18.61
I agree its blues/soul. just because its not the same as every other song they ever did, doesnt mean its the worst. i love it. --Jaysscholar 02:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That's great. The talk page isn't an appropriate place for discussing opinions on the content, though, just an FYI: this area is intended to be a place to discuss how to best present the article, POV aside. Rob 16:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lennon quote

[edit]

I've heard the quote before, but never as a sarcastic comment. I think Lennon actually DID consider this his favorite. We even follow it up with "it inspired Lennon", so let's at least get a citation on this quote. Rob 16:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John's comments were exaggerated, because whilst he disliked it when Paul recorded songs without John, George or Ringo's involvement, in the case of "Why Don't We Do it in the Road?", Paul didn't intentionally exclude George or John, because a) both were occupied with supervising string octet overdubs and b) only Paul and Ringo were available to finish that song, so how could John say that Paul did all of the instruments on the song when in truth, he did all of them except the drums, which were played by Ringo.61.69.217.3 (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

biased?

[edit]

Does anyone else feel that this article, written about a Paul McCartney song, is kinda anti-john Lennon? If this is seen as the case by others, I suggest an article wide rewrite to remove all anti-Lennon POV statements. Zxcbvnm (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edited

[edit]

I removed the material that was added below, but feel free to re-add the information contained if you can verify it and rewrite it in an formal tone of voice.

Actually , the song is about the Abbey Road sleeve photo session . Paul is barefoot to get it done ... now !! John , having an attention span of about 60 seconds , at that point . The song's 'nobody will be watching us ' refers to the mid-afternoon status of 1968 Abbey Road .


--Mithunc 05:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uh, What?

[edit]

There is speculation that the positioning of the song is a subtle joke, providing a question and an answer with the next track, "I Will". This has been done by other bands, notably Weezer on The Green Album, where the song "Hash Pipe" is followed by " Island in the Sun".

Bolded section removed...I may be dense, but I'm failing to recognize how the two Weezer songs referenced comprise a similar Q:/A: scenario. Assuming it's just a gratuitous attempt by someone to insert refs to their favorite band into unrelated articles. Anazgnos 19:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dense you are not, but the error is my part. For the Weezer songs, it's less of a Q:/A: than it is one song title making a joke. It's hard to explain it, which is why it was poorly phrased, but the idea is that when you use a Hash Pipe, you go to an Island in the Sun. I won't put it back in, unless it's agreed that it is similar enough to warrant reference. Ajphctp46

Requested move

[edit]

The CD version of the White Album lists this song's title as "Why don't we do it in the road?", making only the first word capitalized. Is it the same on other versions? --334 16:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree — On the label of the original U.S. LP, all the song titles are shown in all uppercase characters. Should we move all the songs to match those names? No. Album and song names as listed on covers and labels are subject to artistic decisions about typography by the recording artist and also the cover designer. The design extends to upper/lower casing of the names and may or may not match what the songwriter intended, what the publisher has, etc. Official discographies are usually a better guide, but again, there will be variations. Wikipedia has a guideline (policy?) that helps avoid this mess: article names for songs and albums are upper/lowercased according to Wikipedia style rules. Therefore, the article is named properly, in my opinion. — John Cardinal 04:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...Interesting point, I was just thinking about the very same problem. Good answer given by John. — 194.179.2.125 (talk) 01:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The White Album.jpg

[edit]

Image:The White Album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Why Don't We Do It in the Road?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to cover versions ?

[edit]

Confused, here ; I listed a cover that I believed was worth mentioning (under the already existing section appropriately titled "cover versions,") with the correct internal links where due and everything. I'm confused as to what the next edit altogether removed the whole section for ?

Last time I checked, tens of thousands of song pages have a "covers" section, which, in many cases, is as relevant and valuable information as any (unless, of course, we're talking about someone's highschool karaoke band.)

Is this a nomenclature thing ? I want to simply reinstate the change but that strikes me as slightly combative, so I thought I'd make sure and ask first if there are any specific reasons (and what they are) for removing the section. It's not as if the content was anecdotal, I believe most of the covers in there are relevant recordings/performances by respected artists. Thanks, -jin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB04:2E7:A700:750B:A662:DCBB:3F25 (talk) 13:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Why_Don%27t_We_Do_It_in_the_Road%3F&oldid=1202001972"