Talk:Wakulla River

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Meaning of "Wakulla"

Actually, it's supposed to mean (roughly) "mysterious waters"...? - Aerobird 22:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking or saying? If you're saying, cite a source; if you're asking, find a source. ¦ Reisio 23:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I slapped up a quick ref; it's also pretty much common knowledge in the river's local area. - Aerobird 01:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your ref is a tiny advertising blurb on a site that sells stuff to people who like the outdoors. Can't you get something better? The Simpson citation is prestigious in comparison. ¦ Reisio 00:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With a quick Google it was the best thing that turned up. There's probably something to be found in the dead-tree world and I'll see what I can find when I get a chance. - Aerobird 01:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Common knowledge" is often simply not true. (One example I like is George Washington's 'wooden' false teeth.)

"There's probably something to be found in the dead-tree world and I'll see what I can find when I get a chance."

Okay, until you find something saying otherwise, I'm going to revert back to what my dead-tree source says. ¦ Reisio 01:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]