Talk:Vultee V-11

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

R-1820 Twin Wasp ?

Can someone please verify this Information ? Afaik the 1820 was the Cyclone, the Twin Wasp was the R-1830, not the R-1820. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.159.169 (talk) 14:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pages are at Wright R-1820 Cyclone & Pratt & Whitney R-1830 Twin Wasp.NiD.29 (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page name

The USAAC was a minor operator - 5! yet the page uses their designation and the USAAC and Brazilians (with 26) are listed under major operators in the infobox while the Chinese (107), Turks (40) and Russians (32) all used more but are ignored. NiD.29 (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vultee YA-19 → Vultee V-11 – Vultee V-11 was the primary designation - YA-19 applies to only 7 aircraft, the V-11 designation to 146 aircraft, including those 7.NiD.29 (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move - as stated, YA-19 designnation only applied to seven aircraft that saw very limited service. V-11 designation covers a much larger number of aircraft, some of which saw much more significant service than the seven USAAF examples.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.