Talk:Chlamydomonadales

I don't get it, are they flagellates or algae? Surely they can't be both.

Apparently they really are both. see http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/103/5/1353 for an interesting paper on the effect of flagella on nutrient uptake. In this paper, the illumination level (that supports phototrophy) is carefully documented for the experiments.

Pecondon 19:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 09:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Volvocales → Chlamydomonadales – Chlamydomonadales redirects to Volvocales, but based on my checks, I believe Chlamydomonadales is the more correct/accepted name. NCBI lists Volvocales as a synonym. AlgaeBase includes Chlamydomonadales but not Volvocales. Googling Chlamydomonadales pulls up fewer hits but more reliable sources, whereas Volvocales has more hits but more of them are WP mirrors. Google Scholar has something similar - Volvocales has more hits, but Chlamydomonadales has a 2018 source that specifically says that Chlamydomonadales is the current and Volvocales is the former name. And finally, although less reliable, almost all articles for algae in order Chlamydomonadales link to Chlamydomonadales rather than Volvocales. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support We should follow AlgaeBase/NCBI. Plantdrew (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.