Talk:Viva (airline)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Viva (airline) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airline project.

It is requested that a photograph of VivaAerobus headquarters at Monterrey Airport - Aeropuerto de Monterrey, Terminal C, Zona de carga Carretera Miguel Alemán Km. 24 Apodaca, Nuevo León, México be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Nuevo León may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

On 7 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from VivaAerobús to Viva Aerobus. The result of the discussion was moved.

Rewrite

I just edited the article, as it was written in the future tense, though it has started service. Also, it appeared to be extremely biased toward Ryanair. Additional information, or current updates would be useful.Gittinsj 02:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)gittinsj[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VivaAerobus.gif

Image:VivaAerobus.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Destinations page

I moved the destinations to a separate destinations page. I thought that the long list of destinations on the main page made the article look cluttered. I think this way the article is more organized, but if anyone objects, feel free to revert it. (D.c.camero (talk) 05:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Recent edits to the fleet section

@Vmzp85: Forums are not reliable sources per WP:SPS and you did not even include this as a reference in the article but just in your edit summaries. The same SPS rationale applies to planespotters, which you used three times in your last three edits [1] [2] [3]. Additionally, removing the {{FV}} tag from the infobox when the same source is used can be considered disruptive.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accent mark

The name has no accent mark on the official site, even in Spanish. Trigenibinion (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VivaAerobús → Viva Aerobus – Current title is misspelled and I can not realize the move by my own as I am not yet autoconfirmed user. RodVal (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This rarely appears with an accent. The spelling with the space also seems more common than the no-space spelling. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fleet reference makes no sense, source contradicts

The article says: “average age of 5 years, integrated, by 68 Airbus: 42 Airbus A320 and 128 Airbus A321.[42]”. This can’t be correct because those numbers don’t add up. Further, the referenced article currently gives completely different numbers. 107.120.35.102 (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name change to "Viva (airline)"

Hi. Recently, the Mexican carrier has introduced a new logo after months of photos of its new livery being uploaded online. It has removed the "Aerobus" from its brand, so it could be safe to assume "Viva" is its new name. There seems to be no reference to the "Aerobus" text in their recent social media posts, but their accounts still maintain the original name (e.g. "@vivaaerobus"). Animawiki29 (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]