Talk:Visual appearance

neutrality

The image used in this article appears to be blatant advertising for the website in the image. -Eekerz (talk) 07:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is blatant advertising, and I think this image needs to be replaced with a neutral image. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The previous image was not intended as "blatant advertising" and has been replaced accordingly. The terminology in the article is according to the internationally agreed "terms and definitions" of the subject matter.panjasan (talk) 19:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)panjasan[reply]

If certain terms should not be commonly understood, please list them for explanation.panjasan (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)panjasan[reply]