Talk:Virtual goods

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Virtual Goods (Economics) vs. Virtual Goods (Internet)

The term virtual good as used in this article seems to clash with another definition, as in example virtual water. In the latter sense, it means something like a water- or CO2-footprint of the production or consumption of a certain real good or service. These goods often function just as a concept (virtual water) and are not always tradeable (as CO2 permits are). Can this be distinguished in some way from the goods produced, traded and consumed in a purely virtual world? Is there a distinction already? --Asdirk (talk) 13:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the Term "Micropayment"

AFAIK the term "micropayment" refers to the monetary size of the transaction, as compared to common retail transaction sizes. No hard and fast rule for what size constitutes a micropaymant, but it is about the size and not about the purchased good being virtual. The way that the article is presently written, even if I bought something in a world at a cost of $10,000 (however unlikely), that $10K I pay would be considered a micropayment. I do not think that this is so.

Hee is another far-fetched example to further illustrate. Imagine that in the future I can rent a device from a heathcare provider that is implanted next to my heart and, under the direction of the provider, manufactures microscopic amounts of medication using MEMS and some kind of wide-area communication. I pay for the meds via per-dose micropayments. Some tiny amount of money is paid, but it is for a physical, tangible good.

So it is the size of the payment that makes it micro, not that it is for something virtual. The article would be just fine without mentioning it at all. Lsallen (talk) 21:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Microtransactions in Video Games

Gotta mention it because people have referred to the sale of virtual goods in MMORPGs as microtransactions.* If people come across the term and wonder what it means, well, a current meaning is "the sale of virtual goods by a online game company for use in their game(s)". If the term falls out of currency, then by all means let mention of it be erased. But as it stands now, I am all for its inclusion. Fleetham (talk) 00:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

an example of the term used as such

I was also surprised that this article does make more mention of this specifically; I thought MTs covered all forms of virtual goods purchases, whether directly with real money, or through an intermediate form of virtual currency. Is this not the case? Is it more specific? (I moved Fleetham's comment to it's own section).Loonybin0 17:58, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Should "Second Life" be on the list of purveyors?

It might have been omitted from the list due to it's decline in popularity, but I believe it was an early service to sell virtual goods. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.211.249.246 (talk) 18:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Virtual goods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123003030/http://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/microsoftpoints.htm to http://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/microsoftpoints.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]