Talk:Verpa bohemica/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I have examined this article and made a few copy editing changes which you are free to revert. Although short, it covers the subject adequately and passes the GA criteria.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS guidelines

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

It's a bit terse but the wikilinks help out a great deal. Good job. Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 01:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)