Talk:Venusians

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Redirect, 17 December 2021, see discussion.
no consensus, 29 September 2008 (UTC), see discussion.

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This redirect falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal to change "epithet" to "eponym" or "sobriquet"

Odd usage of "epithet": Under "Etymology

...[snip]...

The classically correct form of the word should be "Venerean" or "Venerian" (cf. Latin: venereus, venerius "belonging to the goddess Venus"), but these forms were only used by a few authors (e.g. Robert A. Heinlein). Scientists sometimes use the adjective "Cytherean" to describe Venus, from the goddess' epithet Cytherea."

but in Wikipedia "Epithet" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epithet), under "Linguistics", we see:

"In contemporary usage, epithet is also used to refer to an abusive or defamatory phrase, such as a racial epithet.",

and since Wikipedia is in contemporary usage, why use the superficially correct "epithet", when the more appropriate "eponym" or "sobriquet" may fit?

--SalineBrain 13:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"country"

THe infobox lists the country the the venusians come from is Venus. In case you dont know, Venus is a planet. T.Neo (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The bulk of Venusians treats substantially the same topic as Venus in fiction, and should be merged there. The two final sections cover material already mentioned in the proper individual articles. - Eldereft (cont.) 13:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ufology is not fiction, it is research and theory. Whether any part of a topic under the category of ufology is to be considered fact or fiction is a matter of opinion. It would therefore be inappropriate for an encyclopedia striving for Objectivity_(journalism) to assert as a matter of fact that anything in the realm of ufology is undeniably true or false, fact or fiction. In other words, it would not be okay to merge this article with one about an admittedly fictional concept that is concocted by an individual for the purpose of providing a fictional work. For example, Andromedans in Star Trek have pretty much nothing to do with Andromedans in ufology. One is a make-believe fantasy concept and one is something purported to be real, whether you agree that it is real or not. For textimony on Andromedans, see Alex Coller, and for Venusians, see Luis Fernando Mostajo Maertens at the 2008 Earth Transformation Conference.

--sloth_monkey (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The subject matter of this article is different from Venus in fiction. That article can only deal with actual appearances of the planet Venus in fictional works. References to alleged inhabitants of Venus, not directly connected to fictional portrayals of the planet, do not belong there. RandomCritic (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger not OK. This subject is more specific in my opinion. JMK (talk) 12:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overlooked Films...

Abbott and Costello Go To Mars --Studio 126 (talk) 09:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Venusians/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

What about Valiant Thor from Venus? http://theuniversalseduction.com/articles/valiant-thor-the-human-alien-from-venus-washington-dc-vip-during-late-50s

Last edited at 15:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)