Jump to content

Talk:University of Wisconsin–La Crosse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeUniversity of Wisconsin–La Crosse was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 26, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
December 27, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Requested move 5 November 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


University of Wisconsin–La CrosseUniversity of Wisconsin-La Crosse – Converting from a CFDS for the parent cat made by IP user User:8.29.49.5. The university style guide is unambiguous: The phrase University of Wisconsin-La Crosse should have a hyphen (with no space preceding or following it) between the words Wisconsin and La Crosse. It also notes that an endash is incorrect.

In 2018, a move along these lines was proposed and immediately rejected by User:Corkythehornetfan with the comment, "We don't go by how the university wants stylized." The same user reverted a change to the lead sentence this week.

In Talk:Heriot-Watt University#Requested move 8 May 2022, a request to change a hyphen TO endash was disapproved because official style used a hyphen.

I'm unsure how I feel about this—I lean support—but I am certain that the way forward on this one is to bring it to RM and get consensus. Hat tip to IP User:8.29.49.5 for bringing this up at CFDS. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 23:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.