Talk:2018 United States Senate election in New Jersey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

United States: State Legislatures / Government / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Whittling down potential candidates

There are several figures named as "potential candidates" on the Republican side who have done nothing to suggest a run for Senate besides being prominent New Jersey politicians. Chris Christie earned a mention 3 years ago in an article naming potential candidates, but I don't think that qualifies him as a potential candidate if there's nothing to suggest at this point that he is running (and in fact appears to be advising/supporting Bob Hugin, according to David Wildstein). There are several names with similar stories. The only people mentioned in recent weeks that I could find are Pezzullo, Bell, Goldberg, Singh, Hugin, Crowley and Ciattarelli. That's not to say that all the other names are invalid, but some - like Christie - ought to go. It's excess information that suggests a wide-open race where none exists. On the Democratic side, Michael Hopkins is named as both a potential and declared candidate. It's a subjective call as to which one he is, but he can't be both. Neoquestmoo (talk)

Why is Richard Pezzullo a "perennial candidate"?

Richard Pezzullo has run for office twice in the last decade. What makes him a perennial candidate compared to Hirsh Singh, who was defeated in a primary less than 8 months ago, or Joe Kyrillos who was defeated for this same office by the same candidate in 2012? It is a seriously negative moniker to attach to somebody and is a breach of neutrality. I have attempted to remove it several times and it continually gets replaced. I saw ALPolitico's edit note, but activity from the mid-1990s does not make someone a perennial candidate. I have replaced it because I am a novice editor and it's not my place, but I think there should be serious consideration of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoquestmoo (talk • contribs) 19:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are the qualifications to indicate that a candidate is "Declared?"

I know that anyone can "declare" their candidacy, but is there an official designation that Wikipedia uses to separate "Proposed" and "Declared" other than an official website announcement from their individual campaigns? I would have assumed that the official FEC website would provide authentication for this designation. Thanks.Michaelopolis (talk) 21:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bell has not made any public statements, so it is possible he is merely considering a bid. Jerry B. Watson formed a campaign committee in 2015 but has no online presence and has not raised any money this cycle. I would not consider either of these candidates declared. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.74.113.97 (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sean A. Thom

He is not running for senator; he's running for representative. Additionally, I can't find anything saying that he was going to run in the first place. Maybe he was added by mistake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.73.219.95 (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I removed the extraneous link to him. Letupwasp (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Polling from 2013

Someone claimed this was "historical." There is a whole article on the 2014 Elections, this is an encyclopedia, if they want that info, they can go to that article. Having it here is duplication, which is waste of Wikipedia resources and user resources. This information that is currently on the page in at least one of the polls literally has nothing to do with the with candidates in the race? What in the world is that supposed to tell the reader? It's ugly, it blocks readability, it turns the page in to a chart, and it's literally useless. Put a link to the 2014 race if it's that important. Removing both of these "polls" from 2013. Perhaps you want them on the 2014 election page? 24.116.100.28 (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Running mates"?

Who the heck are a senate candidate's running mates, referred to in the section 2018_United_States_Senate_election_in_New_Jersey#Republican_primary? I've only heard that term used to refer to lieutenant governors and vice presidents in the USA. Airbornemihir (talk) 15:51, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Bob-Hugin (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

BobHugin.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]