Talk:United States Senate

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Senate article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

U.S. Congress Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: District of Columbia / Government Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Top-importance).

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Evans, Greg (February 1, 2020). "US Senate labelled 'dead' in Wikipedia prank as Trump impeachment trial set to collapse". The Independent. Retrieved February 1, 2020. A man named Bruce Halperin took to Wikipeadia [sic] to edit the US Senate page to announce its death and the death of American democracy.
Moran, Lee (February 1, 2020). "Someone Just Edited The Senate's Wikipedia Page In The Most Savage Way". HuffPost. Retrieved February 1, 2020. A prankster took a swipe at Donald Trump and declared the U.S. Senate to be 'dead' on its Wikipedia page after Senate Republicans voted to block witnesses from testifying in the impeachment trial of the president.

United States Senate is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 13, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
November 29, 2007	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States Senate graphic

The graphic by the qualifications section doesn't make any sense to me. Each state only gets two senators, so why does Kansas have five somethings in the image? Even if some of it were referencing the house, Kansas would have six and Florida would have way more than it does on the graphic. I don't want to delete someone's hard work for no reason, but a clarification in the caption of the photo as to what the numbers represent would be helpful. Catboy69 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it out. It's saying that Kansas has a Class 2 Senator and a Class 3 Senator (the class indicating when their terms begin and end), and both are Republicans (hence colored red). WHPratt (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The graphic would be improved if each state were depicted with three blocks rather than two, representing the three electoral classes. Each state would then show one empty, just-an-outline block, indicating the cycle with no Senate election there. E.g., every state should have a permanent configuration of [1] [2] [ ] or [1] [ ] [3] or [ ] [2] [3] with colors appropriate for the current configuration. WHPratt (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and there should be a legend (say down in the Gulf of Mexico), that designates the expiration years in a small 3x3 table (one that would have to be adjusted only every six years).

[2015] [2017] [2019]

[2021] [2023] [2025]

[2027] [2029] [2031]
WHPratt (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are u no adding 2024 102.88.83.97 (talk) 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because the terms begin and end in odd-numbered years. WHPratt (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I want to edit the note [a] as it is misleading to false. Note states "independent Sens. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia do not caucus with the Democrats, but are "formally aligned with the Democrats for committee purposes".[4]"

When going to the following reference [4] The article only speaks of Kyrsten Sinema and her alignment and how she is quoted to say "formally aligned with the Democrats for committee purposes" in the following article "https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/03/23/sinema-trashes-dems-gop-00088461" But note [a] states that "independent Sens. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia do not caucus with the Democrats, but are "formally aligned with the Democrats for committee purposes".[4]" The "formally aligned with the Democrats for committee purposes" is Kyrsten Quote only and we should not mislead the readers that those are Joe Machins words as well, It is blatant misrepresentation.

The note should state that recently Joe Machins left the Democratic party and registered independent. OR we should just remove "but are "formally aligned with the Democrats for committee purposes".[4]" because those are only Kyrstens words quoted not Joe Machins. OR we should be clear that that is Kyrsten's quote only. There are many ways to skin this cat so to speak.

Thank you Cleartheswamp (talk) 21:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: It's always more helpful when you provide more specific proposals, could you tell me which solution do you prefer the most? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -Lemonaka 03:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change membership composition of the Senate to subtract one Democratic senator due to Sen. Menendez's resignation (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdx6l3p5lrro) Mayat14 (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done See this diff, appearing to do what you requestted. [1] Geardona (talk to me?) 01:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone update the “last election” and “next election” fields?

The 2024 election has passed, but the fields “last election” and “next election” have not been updated. I am not able to edit the page as it is protected (understandably), which is why I create this post.

Cheers 82.196.111.116 (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I second this, the results of the election are unanimous and this article should be updated to reflect that Deltakun (talk) 05:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]