Talk:2012 United States House of Representatives elections in Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Connecticut High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

My edit summary got cut off...

So I pressed enter instead of "]" here. I was going to say, in response to this edit summary, that consensus works by users who disagree participating in the discussion which I, anticipating some disagreement, already began at Talk:United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2012 (there rather than here because it's an issue that covers a number of articles, and the Ohio one just happened to be the first one I chanced across). Demanding consensus as a necessary condition for every edit is clearly no way to get things done. Thanks. – hysteria18 (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Talk:United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2012#Candidates & campaign sites as references. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States House of Representatives elections in Connecticut, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100527144033/http://www.ct.gov:80/sots/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=415810 to http://www.ct.gov/sots/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=415810

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]