Talk:United Air Lines Flight 608
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United Air Lines Flight 608 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 8 June 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from United Airlines Flight 608 to United Air Lines Flight 608. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Accident Sequence
[edit]There is extensive quoting in this section, as indicated by the quotation marks. But, no source or link given for those quotes. What is the proper procedure, to correct that situation, so that it conforms to Wiki policies? EditorASC (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- According to the text just before the large quoted section begins, the source is the Oct. 25, 1947 edition of "The Bridgeport (Conn.) Post. You're correct that it would be better to have a linkable source in order to verify those extensive quotations. In any case, I'm wondering if too much is being directly quoted from that newspaper article, per WP:FAIRUSE#Unacceptable_use. In July 2009 I found some archived newspaper articles online dealing with the crash, and created the external links section in the hope that someone (or myself, when I get the time) could use them for references, while avoiding excessive verbatim quotations. The article definitely needs more inline citations, and given the linkable material available it should be possible to cite extensively. --Itsfullofstars (talk) 03:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Revised death toll
[edit]An article in the December 13 1992 issue of the Deseret News states:
1947 BRYCE CANYON CRASH CLAIMED 53 VICTIMS, NOT 52 New research shows that the death toll in a 1947 airline crash in Bryce Canyon National Park matched the record for U.S. aviation history up to that time.The official death toll was set at 52 following the Oct. 24, 1947, crash of the United Airlines DC-6, one less than the national record for the time. But a recent review of mortuary records in Richfield showed that a newborn baby, possibly forced from its mother's womb as a result of the crash, also died, bringing the total to 53...
An excerpt from the article is available here: [1] I'm considering updating wikipedia to state there were 53 deaths, using that link as a reference. Doing so would likely require changing a few other wikipedia articles as well, since the additional victim would make this crash tied for the deadliest in the US at that time, not the 2nd most deadly. --Itsfullofstars (talk) 06:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Introduction
[edit]"It was the first crash of a DC-6, and at the time it was the second deadliest air crash in the United States and the deadliest air crash involving the DC-6." As it was the first crash of a DC-6, it's not surprising it was also the deadliest at the time. Is this superfluous information? 80.189.144.94 (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Jon
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United Airlines Flight 608. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111008095212/http://ntl1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?file&fn=8&name=*S:%5CDOT_56GB%5Cairplane%20accidents%5Cwebsearch%5C102447.pdf to http://ntl1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?file&fn=8&name=*S%3A%5CDOT_56GB%5Cairplane%20accidents%5Cwebsearch%5C102447.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120302213605/http://www.lostflights.org/Commercial-Aviation/102447-United-Air-Lines/5633605_wujwD to http://www.lostflights.org/Commercial-Aviation/102447-United-Air-Lines/5633605_wujwD
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This source is not usable on archive.org due to its dependence on a database. Replaced by another source Grahamj42 (talk) 08:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Aftermath
[edit]This section claims that this was the first air accident to involve reconstruction of the wreckage to determine the cause: but this is not correct. The book 'Air Crash' by Fred Jones (ISBN 0-7090-2161-5) describes this process in detail and includes photographs of reconstructed aircraft showing this was routine in the UK as early as 1941. As there is no reference given for this section I'd suggest deleting the first two paragraphs.
Update: taking the above unsigned paragraph at face value, I've removed the claim that this was the first aircraft wreckage reconstruction. Maybe it was a first for the U.S. but I don't know for sure. Itsfullofstars (talk) 10:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1955 MacArthur Airport United Airlines crash which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)