Talk:USS Shipley Bay

USS Shipley Bay has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 26, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Shipley Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review comments

As with the other reviews I've done on these escort carriers, the namesake information should be in the main body of article
Mention battle stars in main body
Reorder cites at end of first paragraph of design description into numerical order
Decommissioning date in infobox doesn't match what is described in service history
The Samples ref should be listed in the bibliography - no page for cite?
Image tags check out OK
Dupe link - kamikaze - first used in design & description section, second usage in service history

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 17:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Almost there, just the namesake of the bay (John Shipley) is still only present in the lead, not the body. Once fixed, this will be good to go. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Looks good now. Stikkyy t/c 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet as, passing as GA now as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 01:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]