Talk:USS Honolulu (CL-48)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Honolulu (CL-48) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Modernization

The article contains the text: "Reported to be one of two Brooklyn-class cruisers to be modernized, Savannah being the other, with twin 5in/38 guns, there is no photographic evidence of this happening,[6] and Mark 37 directors." I'm willing to agree there is no photographic evidence of this happening: I can't find a post-repair picture of the ship. But more importantly, who said it did happen? Friedman discusses this point around p. 340 in his cruisers book, says that the Savannah repair was so expensive that she was the only Brooklyn to be rearmed, although three others were blistered. Because Friedman says it never happened, I don't know what the point is in including the idea that maybe it did (and not being clear who asserted this in the first place), but that there is no proof. I hate removing content that others thought important to add, but it just seems crazy to even mention this. So I am removing all mention of it, including removal of "modernization" in the intro paragraph.Busaccsb (talk)

2 sources are now in the infobox. perhaps it should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.181.83.48 (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]