Jump to content

Talk:UEFA Euro 2000 final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:UEFA Euro 2000 Final)
Good articleUEFA Euro 2000 final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starUEFA Euro 2000 final is part of the UEFA European Championship finals series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 3, 2021Good article nomineeListed
October 25, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 1, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that France won the UEFA Euro 2000 Final with a golden goal?
Current status: Good article

Formation graphic

[edit]

These are great and a really good addition to WP football articles but they're sometimes spoiled by being wrong. Italy played with three at the back in this tournament and Dugarry and Henry are the wrong way round; Dugarry was an out-and-out striker and Henry was still in his winger days. Better representations would be as follows:

ITALY (3-4-1-2): GK Toldo - CB Cannavaro; CB Nesta; CB Iuliani - RWB Pessotto; CM Albertini; CM Di Biagio; LWB Maldini - AM Fiore - CF Delvecchio; SS Totti

FRANCE (4-2-3-1): GK Barthez - RB Thuram; CB Desailly; CB Blanc; LB Lizarazu - DM Vieira; DM Deschamps - RW Djorkaff; AM Zidane; LW Henry - CF Dugarry

Fair enough. I'll doctor the changes now. – PeeJay 19:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Man of the match

[edit]

We have a bizarre situation with the man of the match award for the Euro 2000 final, in that all the contemporary reports named Thierry Henry as the man of the match, but more recent articles on UEFA.com name Francesco Totti. It seems that Henry was actually the fans' man of the match (decided by a vote during the game), while Totti was selected either by UEFA's expert panel or the host broadcaster (not sure which, but either way, he's the 'official' man of the match). – PeeJay 21:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, strange indeed. Here are some of the conflicting sources:
S.A. Julio (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
After checking the technical report, it indeed was Henry who won the award. S.A. Julio (talk) 21:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UEFA Euro 2000 Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk02:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 13:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • That is a fantastic expansion. Long enough, well-written (I'd like to see a comma after "I'm happy"), all the images are properly licensed, the hook is verified. Send it on. Expanding editor is kindly requested not to make reference anymore to soccer games in which the Dutch team manages to miss five penalty kicks. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To T:DYK/P6

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:UEFA Euro 2000 Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 12:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

General

[edit]
Lee Vilenski, all done, to your satisfaction I hope. Let me know. Cheers, as always, for the review. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, ideal. I can see that, althought I would assume two teams wouldn't meet between two big tournaments like this, but it's fine to keep. Some of your best work, I was enjoying the read. Keep 'em coming. Promoting. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review meta comments

[edit]