Talk:U.S. Route 97 Alternate

U.S. Route 97 Alternate has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 24, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from U.S. Route 97 Alternate appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 October 2018, and was viewed approximately 1,311 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a section of U.S. Route 97 Alternate in central Washington state was rebuilt on higher ground in the 1950s to prevent inundation from a new hydroelectric dam?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington).

Wikipedia

United States: Washington / Eastern Washington / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / Washington Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. Highways

Locations

Washington

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in September 2019.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 15:05, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one as well. Courcelles (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say "travels north alongside" the railroad, since it obviously doesn't literally travel on the railroad.
"during the post-war era." Should likely be specific to which war... it;s obvious WWII, but assume ignorance.
"Route Numbering Committee" Isn't there actually a formal name for the special committee? If this isn't it, it shouldn't be in caps.
30 feet (9.1 m) debris" 30 feet of debris, I would think.

That's it from me. Courcelles (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Courcelles: All points fixed. Thanks for the review. Sounder Bruce 02:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Promoted. Courcelles (talk) 13:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.