This article was nominated for deletion on June 2 2005. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Since 2007, Trip Ross has gained popularity, giving me reason to think that this person now passes the general notability threshold. I am attempting to locate further sources that will support this premise, especially when considered in connection to Greg Nibler who has worked with Trip Ross on the Empty Noggin tv show. However, I am open to advice and consideration. Blueskymorning (talk) 15:10, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well - the best advice is look for the sources; I don't think this meets WP:N, the usual inclusion standard now. But it's too much for an A7, and much more significant than the on deleted seven years ago, so that discussion can't be reapplied. WilyD09:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
