Talk:Tohono Oʼodham Indian Reservation

Sweetwater, Pima County, Arizona was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 January 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Tohono Oʼodham Indian Reservation. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was resolved. Thanks to Labattblueboy for expanding the proposed title into its own article. That should render the RM moot, but if for some reason anyone wants to overwrite or move that article too, let me know and I'll reopen. --BDD (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tohono O'odham Indian Reservation → Tohono O'odham Nation – Changing "Indian Reservation" to "Nation" per official name [1] Relisted. bd2412 T 15:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Sumiaz (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose That's the name of the tribal government, not of the reservation. If you'd like to write an article on the tribal government, feel free. It's not entirely correct to have the name of the government redirect to the article on the reservation. --BDD (talk) 22:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:SCOPE, the article is and should be about the Tohono O'odham Nation, it is appropriate to have this article on the Nation, and it should reflect the official name of the topic. The above argument is clearly just splitting hairs to avoid recognizing the official title of "Nation" in the article title for perhaps other reasons. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 12:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When an article and its scope are out of sync, the problem is solved by changing either. Besides the title, what makes you think the article is about the tribal government? The first sentence and section headers pretty clearly indicate otherwise. --BDD (talk) 16:23, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. As the article is currently [2] completely unsourced, it's hard to be sure what is going on, but the move makes no sense at all to me, and the rationale above that it should be moved to correspond to the official name simply ignores policy. Andrewa (talk) 10:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The article is not about the tribal government, a section in it is. There is no policy against using official names. We simply don't do so when it's notably unhelpful to the reader. That isn't the case here. It actually did have two sources already (2000 US Census, and a Hawaiian website with a page about observatory development on Tohono O’odham land). I added another, the most obvious one, their own official site, so now the only sourced name in the article is Tohono O'odham Nation, and the obvious choice for the article name. Anyone who spends more time arguing about something like this and how unsourced it is instead of the couple of minutes it takes to whip up a {{cite web}} is doing Wikipedia wrong. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 09:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Clearly there are two topics here, the nation and the reservation. Right now the two are intertwined so that you could argue that both titles are wrong (or right). So until the the article is cleaned up, I don't see how we can support this. For the record, the nation web site clearly talks about what appears to be this reservation as the 'main reservation', so it is not clear that this name is incorrect. The best option may be to split the article then there would be no confusion and the need for a rename gets eliminated. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note I've created an article at Tohono O'odham Nation. These were clearly separate topics but the fact that one of the largest native governments in the US didn't have an article seemed like something that should be addressed.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Yo pertenezco a la nación de la tribu de papagos por parte de mi papá que fue nacido en quitobak sonora y me gustaría Ser reconocido y registrado en la nación como le puedo hacer

Yo pertenezco a la tribu de quitobak y me gustaría Ser reconocido y registrado en la nación como le puedo hacer 189.223.220.81 (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]