Talk:Tinbergen's four questions

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animals Mid‑importance

Tinbergen's four questions is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Tinbergen's four questions is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Tinbergen’s four questions on animal behavior are already discussed in three Wikipedia articles: Nikolaas_Tinbergen, behavioral ecology, and ethology.

Actually, these 4 levels of analysis can be applied to any biological phenomenon, not only behaviour, as the "periodic table" below indicates. I have not seen this "periodic table" anywhere else, but it makes sense to me. George A. Lozano — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.47.64 (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So a basic question regarding this article is whether it should be a stand-alone article or be incorporated into one of the existing articles.

I believe this topic deserves a stand-alone article, because of (1) its substantive importance and (2) its length once its basic ideas are fully developed and some examples are given. The causal/temporary relationships among the four explanations need to be presented graphically and the confusion over the “functional” and “evolutionary” explanations needs to be sorted out.

As I envision it, a stand-alone article should be referenced by the above articles as well as by sociobiology and evolutionary psychology, both of which do not (but should) recognize the importance’s of this topic. To point users to this article, I will insert the following statement in the above three articles plus those for evolutionary psychology and sociobiology: “See Animal Behavior Questions for an expanded discussion of Tinbergen’s four questions. The causal relationships among these explanations are presented graphically.”

W Pete Welch 21:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my writing the initial draft of this page, the most difficult issue was selecting its title. A colleague suggested “Tinbergen’s Four Questions.” Do other people have reactions or suggestions?

W Pete Welch 01:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)W Pete Welch[reply]

The following sentence was may be right 100 years ago, as long as a functional anatomy was not developed: "For nonbehavioral aspects of biology (e.g., anatomy), three of the four questions are applicable. Only the proximate mechanism is not relevant, as it cannot be an explanation for itself." The functional anatomy makes research concerning the proximate mechanisms of for example legs, wings, organs for hunting and eating.

Is somebody willing to give examples to the fields in the table? For example fields a1, a2, a3, a4; b1, b2, b3, b4 ect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.171.79.65 (talk) 07:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me a page on Tinbergen's four questions should at some point (probably near the top) include a simple list of the four questions. Something like:

What is the mechanism of the behavior?
How does the behavior develop?
How did the behavior evolve?
How is the behavior adaptive?

I'd do this myself, but I'm not really an expert on the topic, so I'm worried that some of the four questions above are slightly (or not-so-slightly) wrong. 96.252.13.79 (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rating

I've rated this article B class, but it barely meets the criteria. Inline citations and a graphic in the lead will keep the article class at a solid B. Justin ^chat 19:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"periodic table"?

Are there reliable sources that discuss Tinbergen's four questions explicitly using this periodic table analogy? Pete.Hurd (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The metaphor "periodic table" is great. Who is Pete Welch? He used the metaphor already in the initial draft. What is his scientific background? User: gerhard.medicus@tilak.at —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.171.79.65 (talk) 08:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]