Talk:Timeline of the James Webb Space Telescope
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on James Webb Space Telescope timeline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120805155712/http://www.stsci.edu/jwst/news/2003/nasa-announces-contract to http://www.stsci.edu/jwst/news/2003/nasa-announces-contract
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120805232222/http://www.stsci.edu/jwst/news/2007/jwst-passes-tnar to http://www.stsci.edu/jwst/news/2007/jwst-passes-tnar
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Planned subsection of Timeline
[edit]I found this confusing since it lists as planned multiple items planned for years ago. It feels like this subsection hasn't been updated as time passes. I would think it should either be updated or merged into the main section. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heedles (talk • contribs) 15:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- I agree - I believe it's been cleaned up a bit, but there are still two timelines and a separate section for images which should be merged. GreatEgret (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)