This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The move is, however, controversial. Looking at the page history, the page has been moved before because the "official title" differs from the name on the poster. Also, IMDb lists it as "3 Men...", not "Three Men". --Stemonitis08:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, thanks for looking into it. I have no strong opinion either way. If Jaldridge86 wants, I guess he can complete the RM request. --Cheers, Komdori09:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The name on posters, soundtrack CDs, and the film itself, is Three Men and a Little Lady. I can show images if you want. But a google search, using both titles will bring up images of the posters, CDs, etc. Hope that helps. (update) Just looked at the article, it has the poster image there, where it is plainy written out as, Three. I would not trust IMDB on this one. They can be wrong and actually ask for corrections, etc. PS: It is also improper form to begin a sentence, or title with a numerical number, the number should be written as a word. (with very few exceptions for titles) - JeenyTalk22:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the first film, Three Men and a Baby, is also spelled out. Again, it is incorrect form not to. It should be changed. IMHO. - JeenyTalk22:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I agree it's terrible form, but such would not be beyond Hollywood :P. It's very clear the poster uses "Three" written out, and the other materials are probably based on the poster. You mentioned the "film itself" uses "Three"--do you mean on the opening credits screen? I had kind of guessed that maybe the source of the numeral version was there (you know how they write things kind of in a strange way during those openings). Regardless, it seems more people are going to see this film sold or advertised by the "poster title," so barring evidence to the contrary, I would Support the move. --Cheers, Komdori12:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As far as Hollywood and naming films, etc. I agree. That's why I added "with very few exceptions for titles". But in this instance there is no creative reason for the incorrect form, unless the reason is. "lets use the incorrect form just for the hell of it, but use the correct form on posters, CDs and other material just to screw with people." lol. :P (I wouldn't put that past them either.) :P. And, yes, it's written out on the credits too. :) - JeenyTalk13:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then, I'd certainly support the move. It seems the numeral version might be nothing more than the figment of an Internet creation (lazy typist?), and certainly we don't want to model ourselves after imdb when there are many sources to the contrary (including the film itself). --Cheers, Komdori17:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- the poster certainly says "Three", and as above, my old English teacher would gnash his teeth and pound his fists if he saw the number three being written that way in such a context. Not sure what reference is being used to establish the "official title", but I hope it's not IMDb. --DeLarge15:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
During a radio interview on 26th November 2008, Steve Guttenberg confirmed that a script is written for "Three Men and a Bride", which is planned to film in a couple of years with the original cast returning. Should this be included in a "future" section or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.3.142 (talk) 12:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
