Talk:Thomas Cole

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as High-importance).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Smithsonian Institution: Archives of American Art Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Archives of American Art.

Too many images

That is way too many images. Linking to an external site which hosts them would be great, but more than half a dozen in the article is overdoing it. Someone more familiar with his work should prune it down to a top five list, because I am afraid I'd remove some particularly noteworthy ones if I did it. NickelShoe 01:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree. Why not create a Cole Gallery in wikimedia? I have my own prejudices, but I'd volunteer to par down the list. Would someone else volunteer to put all the images under the categoy Thomas Cole in wikimedia commons? JJ 17:46, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Third here. I hooked it up to Commons. Goldfritha 21:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, someone had to be bold. Cleaning it up. Goldfritha 23:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

gasp

Well, it is Better Than It Was. I purged an number of images, and grouped those that were obviously companion pieces together, and added links. Still quite a few pictures to make it representive. Goldfritha 00:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you say create a Cole gallery on here, do you mean a seperate page? I think the "Course of an Empire" series (five paintings) would be good to feature. Any thoughts? --Ragemanchoo82 (talk) 22:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Thomas Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Cole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928014946/http://www.cincinnatiartmuseum.org/Search/collectionresultsitemdetail.aspx?OID=44152 to http://www.cincinnatiartmuseum.org/Search/collectionresultsitemdetail.aspx?OID=44152

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelievably Irritating gif

Can anything be done about the gif for "The Course of Empire"? If we must have gifs of art works (and I actually can't see why they're necessary at all), could they at least cycle through sufficiently slowly to give the viewer a chance to examine each work? RomanSpa (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and have switched the GIF to one that cycles more slowly. Spangineer^ws (háblame) 21:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]