Talk:The Zombie Farm
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recent edits
[edit]Hello, NinjaRobotPirate. In response to your aggressive and needlessly rude edit summary, ("Will you please stop making pointless edits like this?"), there is little I can say, except to note that I never make an edit I consider pointless, and that I of course do not intend to stop making edits that I believe have a point. It is pointless to tell me that I should stop making "pointless edits like this" without clarifying what "edits like this" means. Clarity and basic politeness and courtesy alike would help here.
In this particular case, I simply disagree with you that my changes made the article worse. There is no reason why "zombie film" should link to List of zombie films rather than to Zombie film. Readers would reasonably expect that "zombie film" would link to the article of the same name (zombie film), not to a differently titled article such as List of zombie films. The material about who stars in the film does not read better as a separate sentence. Whether to use "concerns" or "about" is not a particularly important issue, but I'm not sure what the advantage to the latter is supposed to be. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have already explained to you why I oppose these edits, and you have completely ignored what I said. So, I think you can expect a bit of frustration when you continue to make the same edits that I have said that I oppose. Linking to zombie film is fine, of course – that's apparently a new article that didn't exist until last month. I didn't realize someone had created it. I am unsure how a film "concerns" something instead of plainly being "about" something. As I've said before, combining two random sentences often makes the resulting sentence needlessly complex and harder to follow. This becomes even worse when it strings along different thoughts: "
written and directed by Ricardo Islas and starring Adriana Cataño, Nadia Rowinsky, Khotan, Monika Munoz, and Monika Munoz
". That's three conjunctions in a single sentence. That repetitious use of "...and...and...and..." makes the sentence more difficult than necessary to follow. It is best to split these kinds of sentences, not to combine them into a single monster. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)- I do not know what you mean by "these edits". You will have to be specific. Generally, I do not like to recall the details of discussions in which other people berate me in a pointlessly rude, aggressive, and ill-mannered fashion. I am perfectly willing to accept reasonable criticism of my edits, particularly when the criticism is made with some kind of basic politeness, including recognition of my right to disagree with the editor making it. I do not myself think that the sentence "written and directed by Ricardo Islas and starring Adriana Cataño, Nadia Rowinsky, Khotan, Monika Munoz, and Monika Munoz" is difficult to follow. It seems perfectly simple and easy to follow. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)