Talk:The Strange Death of Captain America
Appearance
The Strange Death of Captain America has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 9, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
A fact from The Strange Death of Captain America appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that writer and artist Jim Steranko was given authorship of "The Strange Death of Captain America" in part to resolve a dispute between himself and Stan Lee? Source: Captain America: Penguin Classics Marvel Collection
- ALT1: ... that in developing the story arc "The Strange Death of Captain America", author Jim Steranko sought to reestablish what he saw as the formula that has made Captain America "a cultural icon"? Source: Captain America: Penguin Classics Marvel Collection
- ALT2: ... that the final centerspread of "The Strange Death of Captain America" was penciled, inked, lettered, and colored by Jim Steranko, making it the first Marvel spread to be drawn fully by one person? Source: Captain America: Penguin Classics Marvel Collection
- Reviewed: Joseph Déjacque
Created by Morgan695 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 163 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Morgan695 (talk) 22:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
- Not a review, and I review oldest first so would not get to this any time soon (but would not object to any other editor reviewing this in the interim); if ALT2's "penciled, inked, lettered, and colored by Jim Steranko, making it" somehow manages to survive WP:DYKTRIM, none of "penciled, inked, lettered, and colored" should be linked per WP:SEAOFBLUE.--Launchballer 18:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm fine with de-linking those instances if that's the case. Morgan695 (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm guessing the first hook is meant to say "dispute between himself and Stan Lee"? PanagiotisZois (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Will perform the review. Have a mild interest in the article, and just found out Jim Steranko did concept art for Coppola's Dracula; what a nice coincidence. Anyway
- The article is new enough, having been created only about 8 days ago, which is when this nomination took place. It also has the appropriate length, being very in-depth, and well-sourced; most sources are offline from books, but I'm assuming good faith, especially given the nominator's track record. It is very much presentable, and has three images; one is the writer-artist and is CC, while the other two are the cover of the last issue of this story and an example of Steranko's visual style, which is brought up in the article itself, making them both appropriate.
- On hold All of the hooks are present in the article itself and properly cited. Finding the best one is somewhat tricky, as there's what the nominator finds most interesting, what I find most interesting, and what will help the article achieve the most views. Hook #3 is mildly interesting as you have the primacy effect, but I don't think it will hook many people in, so it's the other two. Either one could work, but I'm leaning more with Hook #1, mostly because it also references Stan Lee, which is a name that will attract views. The mention of a "dispute" between them is also kind of juicy. Admittedly, I found the full context behind their "dispute" kind of boring (lol), but at least the hook did its job. Unless @Morgan695: has a different hook to suggest, the only thing remaining is the QPQ. PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- @PanagiotisZois: Thanks for taking on this review. I've already done a QPQ, so if that is the only outstanding concern than this should be good to go. Morgan695 (talk) 04:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- In that case. Overall: . PanagiotisZois (talk) 11:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @PanagiotisZois: Thanks for taking on this review. I've already done a QPQ, so if that is the only outstanding concern than this should be good to go. Morgan695 (talk) 04:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Strange Death of Captain America/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Morgan695 (talk · contribs) 18:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Cambalachero (talk · contribs) 15:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Images
- File:CaptainAmerica113.jpg (non-free, with rationale)
- File:SterankoCaptAm-page.jpg (non-free, with rationale; text is illegible, but the image is meant as an example of the art)
- File:10.12.12JimSterankoByLuigiNovi1.jpg (free image; all uses in internet seem to be after 2012, it's even hosted in Steranko's page but with credits for Commons)
- Lead
- "fascistic"? Isn't the adjective "fascist" more common?
- Clarified.
- Captain America refuses to take Jones as his sidekick, but later he "defeats the Hydra henchmen with assistance from Jones". If he was not his sidekick, why did he bring him to that fight? Isn't he putting him in danger all the same?
- Jones was already a superhero, per
the Hulk's sidekick Rick Jones
in the plot summary.
- Jones was already a superhero, per
- "In the ensuing conflict, Hydra is beaten back and Madame Hydra is killed". Did someone kill her on purpose, and if so, who? Or did she die by accident? (in that case, it should be "Madame Hydra died").
- Clarified.
- If I understood it correctly, Madame Hydra was introduced in this arc, and killed in the same story? Or the "its new leader Madame Hydra" means that her introduction was still recent?
- Correct, Madame Hydra is both introduced and killed in this story.
- Context
- If you're going to mention the 1940s comics, you should mention its long hiatus and that the Tales of Suspense stories were made after Lee and Kirby retrieved the character in Avengers 4.
- I think that might be excessive context for the purposes of this article; if a reader is interested in additional details about Lee and Kirby's 1940s comics, or the revival of the character in The Avengers, that's covered at Captain America.
- It may be kinda obvious, but if you describe Captain America as a wartime superhero you should mention WWII, so that the references to Hitler and Nazis make sense.
- Clarified.
- Fix "revivial"
- Corrected.
- Production
- "requested and was given" seems a bit redundant or wordy.
- I tried to rephrase to avoid redundancy, but I think it needs to be kept this way to establish that Steranko specifically wanted to write Captain America, e.g. that it was not just a random title that Lee offered to him to resolve the dispute.
- Add the year after "Captain America #109", as with the other specific issues mentioned.
- Done.
- Release
- Just to clarify, was Captain America 112 a new comic by Lee & Kirby, or a reprint of an older one?
- It was an original story.
- Reception
Seems fine
Most of the article seems fine. Just fix those details and we're good to go. Cambalachero (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Cambalachero: Hi, thanks for taking on this review. I've responded to your comments above. Morgan695 (talk) 04:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.