Talk:The Scam (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Requested move 2 July 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Scam (2009 film) → The Scam (film) – No other film articles titled The Scam. There is Scam (film), however this article receives less page views [1]. I don't think it should be necessary to disambiguate either film by year of release, hatnotes should be sufficient. PC78 (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. There is no other film titled "The Scam" on Wikipedia. MelanieLamont (talk) 22:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS. BOVINEBOY2008 12:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bovineboy2008: WP:SMALLDETAILS makes no mention of the definite article, though. But doesn't that guideline encourage us to disambiguate by such details? PC78 (talk) 13:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't believe "The" is a significant enough disambiguator. The year helps and is significant. BOVINEBOY2008 01:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The title is unique as a film. kennethaw88 • talk 23:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominated. I assume the article the opposition is referring to is Scam (film)? This receives double the amount of page views. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.