Talk:Murphy Institute

I argue that this page is no different from any of the other schools or institute pages on wikipedia for Tulane and other universities. It is not copy and pasted. Why is it automatically considered for deletion? I purposely didn't make the page an advertisement about the institute, I just wanted to note that it existed and is an important part of Tulane. How should I make it suitable for publishing? Murinst (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Every one of your references is a primary reference. You need to show that this institute meets the Notability requirements with multiple references to secondary reliable sources.--SPhilbrick T 18:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Now how does it look?Murinst (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@Murinst:

good Jonpatterns (talk) 19:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murphy Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100924002854/http://tulane.edu/news/newwave/121707_murphy.cfm to http://tulane.edu/news/newwave/121707_murphy.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]