Jump to content

Talk:The Masked Dancer (British TV series) series 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Todays Episode

[edit]

Why hasn’t anyone edited todays episode? Could that possibly be amended? 2A02:C7F:5059:5F00:381E:11D1:302F:1AF7 (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Details for October 8 episode.

[edit]

Details for today’s episode such as the songs and dances the celebrities danced to haven’t been added yet. Can someone add it on please? Benfskye1 (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Magikoopa, you are wrong and I am right.

[edit]

Onomatopoeia did not perform "Shake It Off", that was Squirrel's performance last season. Also, Pearly King was not eliminated after the first performance, he was eliminated after the second performance. I watched the whole episode. Please stop reverting my edits - my edits are correct. They're not complete, true, but I'm trying to work on them, yet you keep deleting all of them. 92.11.191.227 (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:ISAWIT. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That really has nothing to do with anything. I explained to Magikoopa, but he refused to listen and just labelled me as a vandal, as he did with The Masked Singer Australia Season 4 (when all I did was remove false information from a show that hadn't even aired at the time). This is the second time now and I'm sick of being treated as the bad guy for doing the right thing. 92.11.191.227 (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'Onomatopoeia did not perform "Shake It Off", that was Squirrel's performance last season. Also, Pearly King was not eliminated after the first performance, he was eliminated after the second performance. I watched the whole episode.' You just wrote that. Yes, ISAWIT has everything to do with why your edits are being reverted. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 19:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. By your own logic, Magikoopa's edits shouldn't be allowed by ISAWIT either, because they were completely original, as well as being incorrect. You have literally no reason to claim what I'm doing is wrong when Magikoopa did the exact same thing. Where's his source that Onomatopoeia performed Shake It Off? Where's his source that Pearly King was eliminated after his first performance? 92.11.191.227 (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am reviewing the episode myself, as this IP is nothing but combative, even *if* they are correct. And just as an FYI, I was not involved the IP's issue on The Masked Singer (Australian season 4), so no idea why they are thinking that. I will have another response as soon as I have reviewed the episode fully. Magitroopa (talk) 19:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't really solve the whole issue with WP:ISAWIT, seeing as we're not dealing with plot summaries which are excluded from requiring references. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 19:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop telling lies about me, Magikoopa. I am not being combative, you're just being stubborn. I explained to you what the problem was and you told lies about me, claiming I was vandalising. I wouldn't have been so harsh if you'd just listened to me. 92.11.191.227 (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making personal attacks. Based on my own personal interactions with you, I would say you are being pretty aggressive in defending your edits, which really flies in the face of what Wikipedia is founded on. Which is collaberation. So much so that you're bordering on falling under the guidelines for editors who are not here to constructively contribute to the encyclopedia. I suggest that you stop editing this article for a while, and maybe come back so that cooler heads can prevail. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 19:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, but Magikoopa is allowed to call me a vandal (itself a personal attack)? Is that right? It seems to me like you're bowing over backwards to defend his every step when HE'S the one in the wrong here. And you're saying I'M the one flying in the face of collaboration? When HE'S the one who reverted them for literally no reason and claimed I was a vandal, even after I explained myself? AND you're fine with him doing original research but not me? This is coming across as very hypocritical of you...and the fact of the matter is, TMS Australia Season 4 happened in exactly the same manner, so with all honesty, I'm sick of being treated like I'm the bad guy when all I'm doing is changing incorrect statements, only to be actively accused of vandalising. Maybe I wouldn't be aggressive if people just listened to me and my reasoning instead of just declaring me a vandal on the spot. 92.11.191.227 (talk) 19:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay- I've finished updating it all so it should all be good now.

First of all, I do apologize if you take offense to the word 'vandal', however, that's definitely what it seemed like when all your edit summaries mentioned was an incorrect song (example), while proceeding to change other information outside of that. Second, I will apologize once again, as I hadn't been watching the UK series lately (I can watch them, but I'm in the US- I watched series 1 of TMS UK, haven't caught up on much since). I did not realize that other editors on the article didn't add the repeat performances from earlier in the season. I do remember that also happening in TMS UK series 1, but had honestly forgotten about that happening while editing this article, so I did not really understand your, "what you're saying is literally impossible".

Lastly, please try to be more WP:CIVIL, even if it appears as though others are against you. Fully explaining yourself rather than jumping immediately to WP:IMRIGHT/YOUREWRONG doesn't help as much. I hope you understand. Magitroopa (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]