Talk:The Malay Dilemma

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems of Malaysia

The problems of Malaysia are the common problems of most nations in the history of the world. They sold themselves out, and despite any strict codes of conduct, they still sold each other out. By the Prisoner's dilemma they mostly did not cooperate with each other and instead--when against superior organized and superior armed forces--they decided to defect in mass. The British has a history of being very well organized due to conflict and threat of repeated invasions where the sea became obvious for their survival, so they guarded the sea routes and defended Britain with the sea. Because they were superior organized with a natural large moat when the New World was found the British were up to the task to take a piece of it leading to Austria, Canada, United States, and New Zealand in addition to having trade across the world giving them better economic opportunities than many other nations including China (that is infamous for internal corruption and selling each other out where the United States and British military stood up to over 20,000 Chinese soldiers in the Boxer Rebellion for over thirty days and won with less than 1,000 soldiers and one engineer priest). Malaysia met the British, but the British never had the military power to take all of the nations they traded with, so what the British did was organize, inflict common law on the people where they could, and then watched the natives upstage each other instead of cooperate and have national identity. India is a good example of this where a few well won battles took the rest of India, as the natives were incapable of organizing without selling each other out (defect in the Prisoner's Dilemma).

Above statement are irrelevant to this wiki entry. And Malaysia does not exist prior 1963. --Sltan 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of each topic in the book

Perhaps someone can give summary for each topic --Sltan 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Critics

Did Mahathir mentioned Malays traditional values, culture and virtue in the book? --Sltan 03:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. He did vehemently criticised the Malay adat or customs. I'm compiling more infos on criticism against the book. --Tikar aurum (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ISBN

not a bad idea to include it. Chensiyuan 17:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I include the infobox with ISBN already. --Tikar aurum (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]