Talk:The Incredible Hulk Coaster/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 02:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

• Probably should mention that IOA is at the Universal Florida Resort in Orlando, Florida.

Done Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• "...with a Hulk theme being selected for a roller coaster" - Ref doesn't seem say that the Hulk theme was for a roller coaster at the time.

Changed to "thrill ride". Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• "On-site construction of Islands of Adventure began in 1997" - The ref doesn't say when construction started just that it was under construction. There's probably a better ref somewhere.

I don't know if there is a better reference. I have reworded to match that of the reference. Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• "...and is illuminated green at night" - Is this supported by ref 6?

Yes Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• Ref 8 redirects.

I've removed the link. Since it was just to the homepage of the site, I doubt it would have been anything more than a way for someone to identify the company in an older revision of the article. Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• If you can find a source, maybe include that B&M refused to make the launch and that is why the launch was sub-contracted.

I think it is only discussion forums, so we won't really know if it is true or not. I know we are 1.5 decades into the future but I believe B&M have said publicly that they will build a launch coaster if a park asks for one. Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• Maybe include the heart attack from 2003 in the history section? (or is a heart attack not really important as it doesn't look like the person died)--Dom497 (talk) 02:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I think this sort of incident would go unreported a lot of the time. A death or severe injury as a result of the ride would be a bit more notable and worthy of inclusion. Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Good work. Just a few things to address. On hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

@Dom497: I think I have addressed your points. Themeparkgc  Talk  03:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 23:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)