Talk:Howard Hughes Holdings

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Ugleh!!

This is one ugly article format-wise. The formidable legendary Hughes-y dserves better. User talk: Manytexts 110.33.2.238 (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC) (Yeh, i deserve a password but i forgot it)[reply]

Merge with Summa Corporation

This article already includes the time period when the company was named Summa Corporation, and the company seems to have continuously maintained a distinct identity since then, even when it was a subsidiary of Rouse and GGP. It seems to me that it's just redundant and confusing to have a separate Summa Corporation article. Toohool (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC) Agreed. BelAirWhale (talk) 5:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Summa was much more than just a real estate company, which the current HHC is. One turned into the other, but they are distinct enough in the past in the same way that I wouldn't want to merge Ferranti into Leonardo. Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After looking into this some more, I don't think a merge would be right after all. The Howard Hughes Corporation that was spun off from GGP in 2010 was not really the same company as the Howard Hughes Corporation that had existed as a subsidiary of GGP (i.e. the former Summa Corporation). The spin-off included that subsidiary's assets, but also a lot of other properties. The spin-off was originally not even going to be called Howard Hughes, but rather General Growth Opportunities; only later did they decide to attach the Hughes name to it. So I would propose that this article is about the spin-off company, and that the content about everything that happened before 2010 be moved to Summa Corporation (other than some basic background info about where the Hughes name came from). Toohool (talk) 06:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Howard Hughes Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325201619/http://investor.ggp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=528861 to http://investor.ggp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=528861

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Howard Hughes Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304060151/http://www.ggp.com/Company/Pressreleases.aspx?prid=542 to http://www.ggp.com/Company/Pressreleases.aspx?prid=542

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]